Computer Systems Research Grading 2nd quarter 2008-2009

Portfolio A B+ B C+ C D+ D F 2nd-4th quarters, course
Project program prototype for quarter 2: writing and code development high level (good amount of code writing/development/analysis) X --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Project program prototype for quarter 2: writing and code development medium level (a little bit of code writing/development/analysis) --- X X --- --- --- --- ---
Project program prototype for quarter 2: writing and code development low level (not much code writing/development/analysis) --- --- X X --- --- --- No program
Oral presentation X --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Logs complete X X X X X X X ---
Literature review 1, background research 1 X X X --- --- --- --- ---
Literature review 2, background research 2 X X --- --- --- --- --- ---
Research paper draft 2, title, abstract, background, introduction, detailed testing and analysis, results conclusions for 2nd q X X X X --- --- --- no paper
Poster draft 2, format 18" by 24", printed copy 8 1/2" by 11", title, abstract, background, subheadings, visuals of testing/programming running/analysis, results for 2nd q X X X --- --- --- --- no poster
Slides draft 2, ppt format (ooffice), title, summary of your presentation for 2nd quarter X X --- --- --- --- --- no slides
2nd quarter updates summary - what you did 2nd quarter different from 1st quarter, what you added to your paper, poster, slides, code, testing, analysis, results X X X X X X X no progress 2nd quarter

Summary

  1. A all portfolio items new for 2nd quarter turned in, high level of working program code, analysis and testing, oral presentation
  2. B+ all portfolio items new for 2nd quarter turned in, medium level of working program code, analysis and testing for 2nd quarter, no oral presentation
  3. B some portfolio items new for 2nd quarter turned in, medium level of working program code, analysis and testing for 2nd quarter, no oral presentation
  4. C+ some portfolio items new for 2nd quarter turned in, low level of working program code, analysis and testing for 2nd quarter, no oral presentation, not much done new for 2nd quarter from 1st quarter
  5. C few portfolio items turned in, low level of working program code, analysis and testing for 2nd quarter, not much done new for 2nd quarter from 1st quarter
  6. D+/D few portfolio items turned in, logs, not much working program code, analysis and testing for 2nd quarter but some effort made, though little actually done 2nd quarter
  7. F for the rest of the year: no portfolio drafts - paper, poster, slides, code, analysis and testing, nothing done for 2nd quarter